What is deceptive acquires illusory substance to the observable. Both share reciprocity in tautologies that define the observable as the absolute sum total of the empirical. Is this to imply that an observable reality is an empirical one buttressed under conditional circumstantiality? Ideological closures made out of arbitrary convenience forge analytics out of immediate necessity. The foraging of instantaneity limits experimentation to absolute conventionality. Known unknowns must be hurriedly dismissed into the eccentric fringe as speculative afterthoughts. The doctrinairian is little more than a gatekeeper of superficial orthodoxies that tokenize intellectual emptiness to the distractional aesthetics of thought. The idiomatic becomes an anathema to knowledge imposed when categorically denied by preexisting aliases of conventionalized knowledge.
Thus, for every inevitability, an adjoining eventuality follows for better or worse. The philosophic consequences of the experimental stand existentially indifferent to materialization. The disciplinary regimentation of linear thought limits conscientionality for subliminality where implied truisms supplant platitudes of peaked intelligence. The delimiting of discourse to the phenomenologically singular by means of lopsided dimensionality centers on dismissive reductionism.
A sort of devariablization occurs emphasizing totality to a zero sum comparative reality. Thus, does instantaneity function as a universal coupling point adjoining generalizations to observable aggregations of reality? Is reality absolute as sensory phenomenon as preliminary observations become formative extrapolations?
Is observation linked to definitudes adherent to the paradoxically malleable? Can this inspire a Paradox of the Indisputably Observable? Where there is instantaneity, there is reductionism culminating in relativism.
Comparative analogies of reality turned convergences of reductionist discourse wedded to literal substantiality inspires preliminary observation. The hidden tragedy in any figurative analogy occurs when the theoretical becomes implosive; this process captures the quintessence of sophistry.
Once recognized, originators experience cancellation by their own philosophizing devices through lopsided extraneiosity.
Thus, sophistry begins when pathos consumes logos by creating a reality of zero sum existentiality…